Saturday, December 25, 2010

RHEL 6 is built, and priced, for big shops

Latest iteration of Red Hat's iconic Linux distribution offers some shops a substantial upgrade and, for others, a fork in the road

There's always a sense of finally when a new version of  (RHEL) is released. We always know what's coming in the new OS, and generally we know when it'll be available, but we're still working with rapidly aging packages on the previous version and drumming our fingers for the next release.
With RHEL, the longer release cycle is the penalty to be paid for stability. When a new version of RHEL appears, it's been vetted for many moons through the cutting-edge Fedora Linux distribution. Presumably, most of the bugs have been worked out, but that doesn't help when you're busy shoehorning PHP 5.3 and MySQL 5.25 onto an RHEL 5.4 server.


The good news in RHEL 6 is a wealth of new features. These include very significant enhancements, long-awaited updates, and items that have been in place on other nominally less-stable distributions for months, if not years. After all, it's been nearly three years since RHEL 5.0 was released. The net result is that RHEL 6 is easily the best Red Hat Enterprise Linux release yet.

RHEL 6 hardware support


First up are the enhancements to the core system. RHEL 6 defaults to the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler) process scheduler and the usual CFQ (Completely Fair Queueing) I/O scheduler.

For x86_64 CPUs, RHEL 6 can natively support up to 128 cores and 2TB of RAM. Using other kernel extensions, those limits can be stretched to 4,096 cores and 64TB of RAM, if you're really pushing big iron. Naturally, this is thanks to the Linux 2.6.32 kernel.

Red Hat has also done plenty of work in optimizing memory management with NUMA, which can produce significant performance increases on larger systems.





Virtualization performance is reaching impressive levels. Red Hat says that a virtualized guest environment offers between 85 percent and 95 percent of the performance that you would get by running on native hardware for CPU-intensive operations. It shows that the overhead of virtualization is decreasing and doesn't come with a serious performance penalty. The company also says that its virtualization technology is getting better at handling I/O-heavy workloads too, such as guest environments that run database software.